How I Hire: You're Not Interviewing For the Job You Think You Are

By the time I’m considering a senior-level candidate, the final decision rarely comes down to their ability to relate a prior experience or convince me they can perform specific tasks in the job description they're interviewing for. Frankly, if I’m doing my job, by the time they get to me the candidate’s experience and proficiency has been vetted and established.

What I’m looking for is what they are going to be able to do to make us successful beyond their job description.

How does the individual sitting in front of me relate to people, approach unusual challenges, flex when blind spots are exposed? In essence, I want to find out not just how they “fit” their defined functional role but how they will be able to quickly adapt and make decisions that will have impact well beyond it.

Those able to spot opportunities for change, early, and flexible enough to move strategically toward addressing them, even when they may be outside business-as-usual parameters, are going to add disproportionate value. Most of the best executives I've observed take their roles well beyond what an organization can even contemplate at the time of an open position. Further, they have enough emotional intelligence to be able to push the organization forward without leaving a cloud of smoke in their path. I want those people on my team and I try to use the interview and vetting process to find them.

If proficiency in the skill set can be presumed, I might ask interview questions about flexibility and off-the-top-of-one’s-head decision making to an analytical thinker; or perhaps I'll push a discussion of business specifics and timely action with someone seeking a more traditionally “creative” position. Give me the marketer who sees that their role goes far beyond a piece of key art to promote a new show, for instance, and actually understands that marketing truly lives in the center of our organization. Or a finance person who is energized - and not paralyzed - when the story the numbers are telling and the aspirations of the business seem to conflict at forecast time.

The assumption I'm comfortable making in interviews, if a candidate has made it this far, is that they can do the job they were brought here to talk about. What I really want to get down to is their ability to perform beyond the specific functional tasks that are written on the paper in front of us.

Photo: Aerogondo2/Shutterstock

Thank you. As a film / TV director that has yet to secure an agent even though I was chosen for Ryan Murphys Half Foundation diversity director shadowing program, I need to know how executives in the television world think about each person that contributes to their overall success and how to leverage that information for future interviews with show runners and such. I have three interviews coming up with FX, And Fox to discuss future directing opportunities so this helps a lot. Hopefully one day I will be sitting in front of people at AMC for the same opportunity. I searched all over to see if AMC had a shadowing program or program for diversity/ women directors but couldn't find anything. Thank you Charlie Collier for your advise. Maybe 1 day we will meet and I can show you how I can bring more to the table as a very good and determined director. When Jamie Lee Curtis turned to me and said I hope you come back as a director on an episode I knew I was validated not only by Ryan Murphy but by Hollywood Royalty. We'll meet soon!

Like
Reply
David Stolte

Principal at Balleykissel Limited - San Diego area

8y

Do you know someone who might help me with a voiceover avocation ?

vikas chugh

Sr.Executive at Bajaj Finserv (CD loans.)

8y

what about position

Like
Reply
MIRSANDA STANIC, MD.PhD

Inventor of Medical Device & Pharma products, Translational Medicine & Science, Ob/Gyn spec., Migraine Healing, IVF & ET

10y

:) What about genius for free?

Like
Reply
Michael J. Piellusch MA, MS, DBA

Technical Writer/Editor @ U.S. Department of Homeland Security | Contract Technical Writer/Editor

10y

We all know from our work experience that most work places have three types of employees: the stars, the students, and the prisoners. The prisoners are like the “3 o’clock club” at school. They can’t wait to disappear at the stroke of three (even if they were a few minutes late at “oh-dark-thirty” when no one else was around in the halls or on the highways). The students are the majority of workers learning the job and enjoying the challenges. The stars are the leaders, teachers, and innovators; they may arrive early, or stay late, but they are fully engaged and make a consistent impact. To me, the interviewer is looking for stars, will settle for new students; but hopefully will not select any prisoners.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics