Three Reasons Your Ethics Code Probably Stinks and Three Ways To Fix It

Without even seeing it, I'll bet your ethics code stinks.

It's a harsh assertion but strong odds are in my favor. Why? Because so many of the codes I've read - and I read a lot of them in my line of work - can be categorized into one of three impressively unhelpful types:

1. A LIST OF RULES CALLED AN ETHICS CODE - Obviously everyone needs to know the rules but let's not confuse them with ethics! Ethics have to do with the broader underlying values and mandates the rules are there to represent. (If you want to understand this idea in more depth, just contact me. I’ll be happy to talk you through what I mean by this as well as its deep and broad implications for ethics, compliance and accountability.)

How To Fix It: Ethics are, among other things, a reflection of your organization's values. Therefore, your ethics code also needs to reflect your values and not just the rules. Further, in the course of doing so, your code needs to be written in such a way that it will help employees know what to do when there isn't a rule for something. Think of it this way, if your ethics code isn’t helping employees make better decisions, why even have it?

2. A RISK MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT CALLED AN ETHICS CODE - I used to see these almost exclusively in the financial sector and occasionally in healthcare. Lately, I have seen these rear their ugly heads in a much wider range of sectors. These are typically extensive documents, usually written by corporate counsel or some outside third party, in generally indecipherable 'legalese', and are designed to protect the organization from your inappropriate behavior. You'll be asked to sign off on having received it as well as on your understanding of it but good luck figuring out what it actually means.

How To Fix It: Make no mistake, there are plenty of reasons to have effective risk management documents onboard. Just please don’t call them ethics codes. If your ethics code is going to actually help employees make better decisions, and it needs to, your employees had better be able to understand – clearly – what your code says and means. That can only happen if it is written in plain, clear language that is easy to digest, recall, and apply. (NOTE: If your code doesn’t allow all three of those outcomes, you aren’t done yet.)

3. A LIST OF ‘THE SIX CUSTOMARY THOU SHALT NOTS' CALLED AN ETHICS CODE – This is, in my experience, by far the most common of the these three most useless ethics code types. Versions of his model might look and read quite differently but, strip away the surface differences, and what’s underneath is pretty much identical.

These codes are really simply a list of the six traditional ethics code ‘regulars’ and so they will tell you, in some wording or another, not to (1) lie, (2) cheat, (3) steal, (4) work outside your competence, (5) have inappropriate business relationships, or (6) bring dishonor to whomever is calling this their ethics code.

Those all sound pretty good, don't they? But when was the last time you ran headlong into a torturous ethical dilemma and were helped by reminding yourself, "Oh yeah! I'm not supposed to lie, cheat or steal!" I'm guessing we can all easily file this type of ethics code under "Not Terribly Helpful" no matter how positive their intentions.

You’ll have to dig deeper. Really.

How To Fix It: This may be the simplest sounding fix in this article and yet it may well, in reality, be the toughest one by far. You’ll need to do the often-hard work to figure out what are the real-life issues your employees are likely to encounter and then address them both clearly and in practical terms in your code. There’s no way you’ll ever be able to anticipate all of them, of course, but that’s exactly why #1 above is so important (i.e. employees need to know what to do when there isn’t a rule or guideline for something).


Soooooo…

Does your ethics code help employees know how to consistently and appropriately apply your organization's values to the issues confronting them in their day-to-day decision-making?

Is your ethics code written in practical, easily understood and easily applied language?

Does your ethics code help you know what to do as opposed to only telling you what not to do?

I don’t actually care how great your code currently looks or sounds. If it doesn’t pass all three of the above tests, I’m going to say you aren’t done yet; and, if changes still need to be made, get to it! After all, done right – meaning that in some way it drives all decisions - your code becomes a significant piece of your platform for both growth and sustained success. Why would you pass that up???

Need help with an ethics code ‘make-over’? No worries. Let me know and I’ll be happy to help in any way I can. That’s just one of the ways in which I help companies create and maintain cultures of ethics, compliance and accountability.

Christopher Bauer works with executives and managers who are highly invested in their employees consistently doing what they are supposed to be doing. In addition to speaking, training, consulting, and coaching, he writes on ethics, compliance and accountability for a wide range of both print and online publications. Further information on his programs as well as free subscriptions to his Weekly Ethics Thought are available at both www.ChristopherBauer.com and www.BauerEthicsSeminars.com.

Katrin Osterhaus, CIA, CGAP - Glad you liked the article. If it would be helpful to chat about ideas for your webinar, please be in touch. Glad to help any way I can

Like
Reply
Katrin Osterhaus, CISM, CISA, PMP, CIA, CGAP

IT Audit Manager at Legislative Division of Post Audit

9y

I loved the article. I need to put on a webinar on ethics and was wondering if anyone had something already prepared that incorporates the concept of...just because we are auditors doesn't mean we have a great ethics code, or we abide by it without getting reminded. Any thoughts?

Like
Reply

True, Monica Dimitriu. Most individuals and organizations alike feel like they're fine. It's somehow everyone else who needs structure or guidance. Yet, it can't magically always be someone else... :)

Monica Nicolle Dimitriu DTM. Project manager-Executive Coach-Corporate Trainer

Executive Coach| DISC profiler| Corporate Communication & Leadership Trainer| Project Manager & TEDx events organiser| Public Speaker-Facilitator| Radio Broadcaster| Author of "Coaching and Communication Strategies"

9y

I think that first of all, when organizations decide to have such a code, they should start by having a clear idea between the difference of a code of conduct and a code of ethics. Secondly they have to choose the language and the form to issue such a code and thirdly they have to think the way / manner to implement it. For all these steps (which are only the first steps), there is a need of STRATEGY... which very often it is not the case. The organizations know that they have to do it because others have it as well, not because they really think that these codes are important for their existence and future.

I completely agree, Mmakobe Sitwe, and of course that same 'check the box' mentality will almost always be reflected in their ethics and compliance training as well. The one thing I'd add is that I'm also impressed by the number of companies who really do seem to have a genuine interest in ethics and STILL have terrible, unhelpful codes.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics