Feelings Guide Your Decision-Making
Unsplash

Feelings Guide Your Decision-Making

Neuroscience is helping to dispel long-held beliefs that intellect alone is responsible – and desirable, for effective decision-making.

Cultural conditioning still influences the belief that emotions are irrational impulses that impede clear fact-based thinking.

Understanding that electrical impulses traveling through emotional centers in the brain “evaluate” the emotional data necessary for correct decisions can help people to unlearn the inaccurate belief that “emotions have no place in decision-making.”

Consider for a moment that human experiences are experienced through our senses: visual, auditory, kinesthetic (feelings), olfactory (smell) and gustatory (taste). This process is unconscious and unique to each person.

For example, here is a sample illustration of how an unconscious “strategy” for decision-making might work:

  • First step - you talk to yourself (auditory internal) about the context, issues, etc. surrounding the decision
  • Second step - you have conversations with other people ,receive feedback regarding your thought processes (auditory external)
  • Third step - you then seek out additional information, gather data through reading various information (visual external)
  • Fourth step - you then “talk” to yourself and evaluate the information (auditory internal) you gathered
  • Fifth step - you make a picture in your mind of the affect, consequences (internal visual) and possible outcome if you went ahead and made the decision
  • Sixth step - then you get a strong positive feeling (kinesthetic internal) from the internal picture and you make the decision.

Notice that the last step in this hypothetical decision-making strategy, prior to making the decision is a feeling state…connected to an emotion/s. Feelings guide the process, even when we are unaware of it.

It is highly probable that people who have difficulty making decisions may take a long time getting to the feeling state. One possible reason for this might be they keep recycling to internal auditory (self-talk) ruminating about the conditions, facts, issues, consequences, etc. and never get to a positive emotional/feeling state. This can trigger old thoughts (this won’t work because) and feelings (worry, doubt, fear).

Conventional thinking about reason over emotion is generally based on two assumptions: the first is that we have a choice whether to feel or not, and second, that emotional “suppression” works.

According to Dr. Daniel Wegner, professor of psychology, Harvard University, there can be significant consequences when you try to push away thoughts and feelings. He called this the “rebound” effect. Simply put, these strategies often backfire and result in an increase of the intensity of the thoughts and emotions that are being suppressed.

Our prevailing misconceptions about how the brain works keep us mired in obsolete ideas about the decision-making process. Many of us try to rule out the emotional side of decision-making only to find we become stuck in so-called analysis-paralysis. We often avoid making decisions or make them hastily because we want to skip the feeling part, not only unavoidable, it’s short-sighted.

A lot of precious neural energy is wasted on the either or debate of emotion vs. reason in decision-making. In fact, it’s over-thinking that tends to overwhelm our rational pre-frontal cortex. When faced with too many variables, the brain simply makes the wrong decision because its resources are overburdened.

To optimize your decision-making process, you have to build capacity in both your brains – the rational and the emotional. They’re brilliantly interwoven to maximize understanding the world around you and the vast world within you. It means bringing more of your thought process into your conscious awareness.

5 Key Steps to a More Conscious Decision-Making Process:

  1. Notice the content of your thoughts.
  2. Notice what you feel when you think about the possibilities.
  3. Pay attention to how much you draw on past decisions and outcomes? Are they skewed more towards successes or mistakes?
  4. What kind of language do you use to talk to yourself? Is it kind or harsh? Does it vary? If so, when?
  5. What’s your decision-making style? Do you over-analyze, generalize or prematurely cut-to-the-chase of a problem?

Understanding what you think and how you feel under different circumstances is critical to this process. Depending on the scope and importance of the decision this will vary. Make sure the information you consider takes into account your intuitive sense of the right direction to take.

Studies show that long before your reasoning mind kicks in, your emotional brain has been sensing the way to go. Your feeling brain is listening through your body, so the information that you receive is sometimes subtle and somatically based.

Every choice we make is based on a feeling. Becoming more conscious of how thought guides feelings and vice-versa will give you much more control and freedom in what you decide.

This article adapted from original at Mindful Matters

George Altman is an Executive Coach, Organizational Development Consultant and founding Partner at Intentional Communication Consultants. George is also a senior leader and course developer for the American Management Association. Connect with George Altman

 

Peter Cole

Mindfulness Meditation Coach ★ Practioner ★ Researcher ★ Entrepreneur ★ Law of Attraction Advocate ★ Friendly Person

9y

I've not been out of my depth yet, since getting involved with talking about feelings, but I'm on my tippy toes in here alright. I blog with a heavy nudge to this exact subject and you guys are answering/confirming so many things, thank you. I'm going to be teaching heavily about feelings very soon and I'm delighted to know there is such professional back-up about the place. Talking about dealing with feelings is a lonely subject area I've been finding, it's nice to make land!

Erika Salina, MA, PhD

CEO | Organization Development Consultant | Professional Speaker | Author | Founder, The Heal Work Hurts Project

9y

Terrific post, George! Brings to mind parallels to a system that I experienced just yesterday called "The 6 Advisors" (www.sixadvisors.com) . . . coach Louise Griffith, M.A., LP expertly guided me through the assessment which explores each of 6 'advisors at my board of directors table' -- their unique narratives/influences, and then of course, emphasizes my active and lead role in keeping each advisor's voice in balance. Love the way you've outlined the decision-making steps also.

Like
Reply
Edna Maule-ffinch

Senior Consultant at Applescott Insurance

9y

Brilliant and interesting article. Gives us much to think about!

Like
Reply
Kevin Burns

Radar Systems Engineer - Senior Member of Engineering Staff at Lockheed Martin

9y

Hi Josh, my take on George's steps 1-5 is that he implied they include the emotional components. A phab article. Josh and George, Martin Shervington on Google Plus posted about an interesting TED talk (9:53 vid, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVXQUItNEDQ ) by Ray Kurzweil: "Get ready for hybrid thinking", where he provides some insight about pattern recognition modules (PRMs) (see diagram at 4:03) that are linked in hierarchical fashion in our neo-cortex. Ray's talk relates to "hybrid thinking in the future" where bots in our brains will be able to connect to the cloud to "search" for information in real-time. My interest here is several fold, but in respect to George's relevant premise that "feelings guide our decision making", Ray's talk provides some relevant neuroscience concepts. His takeaway is that this added quantity of hybrid computer power from the cloud will allow us to take another qualitative leap in culture and technology. He counted 300 million of these PRMs in our brain. If we can fetch another billion equivalent PRMs from the cloud in 20 - 30 years from now, this makes me wonder about the effect this significant added data flooding into our neocortex will have on our integrated emotional/cognitive brain processing functions.

Like
Reply
Joshua Freedman

MCC, CEO of Six Seconds - the global emotional intelligence community

9y

Hi George - further, actually each of your steps 1-5 that are "not emotional" actually have an emotional component. EG the "auditory internal" process is colored by emotion, we notice and appraise data for that "conversation" based on our current emotions. Emotions are a "meta filter" for all our cognitive processes, helping us decide what to notice, what's important, and what it means.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics