Will The "2nd Economy" Really Wipe Out 100 Million Jobs?

Will The "2nd Economy" Really Wipe Out 100 Million Jobs?

The second economy may be the biggest economic factor you’ve never heard of.

Brian Arthur’s definition of the second economy is when what was formerly a physical task becomes digital. Imagine for a moment, you want to place an order from a catalog 20 years ago (if you can remember that far back!). You would fill out an order form and put it in the mail, or call the company up on the phone. Either way, someone on the other end would record your order, process your payment, arrange to have your goods pulled from the warehouse, box them up, and ship them.

Now, you go online to place the order, and a computer registers your request, processes your payment, sends the goods request to the warehouse, and — if you’re working with a sophisticated distribution system like Amazon’s — a robot pulls the merchandise, it’s packaged on a conveyor system, and shipped.

All of those formerly physical tasks are now taken over by computers working with other computers.

And it’s happening everywhere, all the time, almost entirely out of sight. By Arthur’s estimation, even though the second economy produces nothing tangible, it will be as large as the first, physical, economy by transactions and dollar value in the next few years.

On one hand, the second economy and the proliferation and democratization of the tools that go along with it, can have its upsides. The Maker movement and citizen scientists recording all manner of data about their physical bodies and health have the potential to create lasting change across many fields.

On the other hand, the second economy is responsible for the disappearance of many times more jobs than outsourcing to India or China. The truth is that we’re seeing a radical destruction of manufacturing jobs and administrative jobs, and some thought leaders suggest that the service economy is next, with the advent of waiter bots, receptionist bots, etc. There are far fewer paralegals, bookkeepers, telephone operators, or draftsmen than there used to be.

They’ve been replaced by machines.

As these job opportunities for flesh and blood humans dwindle, a larger and larger portion of the population will find it increasingly more and more difficult to find work. Jobs will may eventually be clustered at either end of the spectrum, in very low-wage unskilled positions filling the gaps between what the computers can and can’t do (yet), and the very high-wage, highly specialized positions that require a high degree of training or intelligence or both, such as programming the computers.

Of course, the economy may adapt. How, we can’t easily predict. But the fact remains that the second economy is destroying job opportunities almost as fast as it’s making calculations.

Will the second economy wipe out 100 million jobs? It’s possible it already has.

Big data and the second economy

Much of this second, parallel economy feeds on data. Information from one system triggers a reaction or a process of another system. When you check in for an international flight, for example, the check in system might tell the baggage handling system the number of bags you’re bringing and alert air traffic control that the flight is getting ready to take off.

This data and the processes it spawns are changing the way things are done. For example, data collected about consumption habits is being used to drive advertising, which is transforming traditional marketing and advertising roles. It’s not hard to imagine a time in the near future when a set of data — brand standards, consumption habits, color psychology — are fed into a computer program which then spits out a perfectly optimized advertisement.

No graphic designer need apply.

In the short term this is likely to create jobs, especially in analytics and programming. Experts estimate that fully one third of Fortune 500 organizations will start to see major problems with their business intelligence by 2017.

But solving those problems has the potential to eliminate other jobs.

The Internet of Things

Sensors make it possible to get data in places we never could before, like sniffers that can tell when fruit in a warehouse is about to spoil, and sensors on jet engines that can predict when the physical parts will require maintenance.

Are these sniffers and sensors putting people out of work? Maybe not directly, not yet, but the potentiality is there. As the technology improves, it’s possible that the airline decides it can rely on the sensors to check an aircraft between flights, and no longer needs a ground crew to do that job.

It seems that one of the biggest dangers here is that as the machines get smarter, the people can get… well, dumber. Or, at least, less specialized and less well trained.

The produce manager who used to spend years working up to his position learning the signs that a bunch of apples was about to turn no longer needs that specialized skill that used to make him good at his job; he can rely on his sniffers to do the job for him.

What are your thoughts on this silent disappearance of jobs? Do you believe the second economy is a good thing, spurring us on to new developments and new business models? Or is it a silent job killer, with major implications for our economy?

I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below.

--------------

As always, I really appreciate that you are reading my post. Here, at LinkedIn, I regularly write about management and technology issues and trends. If you would like to read my regular posts then please click 'Follow' and send me a LinkedIn invite. And, of course, feel free to also connect via Twitter, Facebook and The Advanced Performance Institute.

Check out other recent LinkedIn Influencer posts by Bernard Marr:

About : Bernard Marr is a globally recognized expert in strategic metrics and data. He helps companies and executive teams manage, measure, analyze and improve performance.

His new book is: Big Data: Using Smart Big Data, Analytics and Metrics To Make Better Decisions and Improve Performance

Photo: Shutterstock.com

Earl D Shaffer

SVP/CTO Oracle DBA Practice - OracleMan Consulting

9y

the "Terminator 2" movie seemed so far-out at the time but ...

Karen Baghdasaryan

Специалист Оптовая торговля

9y

Please help me! Pls respond! We are very grateful to the well-wishers to help cure the girl Linke. Ashamed to write, and I never thought that I would go for it, but life is a complicated thing. The accident occurred on the night of Armenia - the car in which she was at high speed crashed into a tree. The blow fell on the back of the car, where she was sitting. lost consciousness and was not able to call for help. She was a great loss of blood, was only saved by the fact that the number of hospital and as the doctors say, a rare case that enough blood, it was the right group. Now Lina is in intensive care, and her family in dire need of financial support - money is needed for long-term rehabilitation and subsequent prosthetics. Family independently collect the required number of can not. Please help for the treatment of girls. . Appreciate any of your amount.          I really hope for your mercy. Paypal-bagdasaryan 84@gmail.com

Like
Reply

Second Economy scares me. It only means endless education and re-education to adapt and more student loan debt...

Like
Reply
Rony Neogy

Block Level Accounts and Administrative Assistant (BLAAA) at Panchayat & Rural Development Department (Govt of West Bengal)

9y

World leaders are eyeing on the first Union finance budget of 16th Lok Sabha in India.Economic powers will emite what signals?

Like
Reply
Ronan Lucid

Managing Director at ARCAL

9y

Hi Bernard Marr, I think the 2nd economy will create thousands if not millions of jobs that currently do not exist which will go a long way to replacing those eliminated. These new roles typically are higher paid and higher value add. Think robot maintenance, installation of the sensors for IOT, analysis of the data, software development and update. The pace of development of technology also ensure a shorter life-cycle with more design, engineering, testing and production. Typical life cycles of products are a fraction of what they used to be. Also when if we were reach a stage where consumption and demand drops due to less people working etc it will slow development of all of these things putting a brake on further development - bringing a natural equilibrium. That is not to say that it will not be highly disruptive and damaging to certain individuals and groups in the short term. There are other macro benefits to the second economy and technological change - the discussion about peak oil has reduced as a result of greater technological on both supply side and demand side - e.g modern combustion engines and hybrid powertrains (use between 1/3 and 1/2 the amount of fuel of those from only 10-15 years ago).

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics