How Innovation is Like Sex

I woke up early this morning to finish a very profound article on the future of jobs. This clearly is not it. Instead, I thought we could have a little fun with an idea that’s been rattling around in my head since I've been doing innovation: Innovation is like sex. A lot like it. A bunch of unrelated (hopefully) individuals having intercourse, hoping to birth something extraordinary. Well, at least that’s what the textbooks say.

Here are 11 ways innovation is like sex:

  1. Both will be messy...even if you’re doing it right. Especially if you’re doing it right.
  2. Those talking about it most are doing it the least.
  3. Chemistry is important. Different partners produce wildly different results.
  4. Variety and exploration are fun, but most experiments don’t work out. The few that do, can be amazing.
  5. You don’t have to be first for it to be great. (OK, for one of them, you might want to be first that day.)
  6. Both are more satisfying when you don’t have to pay for it.
  7. Both spawned a cottage industry of experts teaching you how to get some. (Myself included...I suppose.)
  8. You probably shouldn't do either until you’re ready – mentally, physically, financially.
  9. Neither requires a special room, but the right atmosphere makes a difference. May I suggest some Barry White? For the office, of course.
  10. Both can only achieve transcendence once you commit and invest for the long term.
  11. Everyone can tell when you're faking it.

Back to the serious stuff next week...

For now, you can sign up to the IdeaFaktory mailing list to get updates on my upcoming articles on innovation and entrepreneurship. You can also follow me at IdeaFaktory, LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+, and Twitter.

Image: Paul Vera-Broadbent/CC/Flickr

Mikkel Pitzner

Owner @ The Automated Millionaire | Helping Business Owners and Their Teams Make Much More Money

9y

Funny article. Funny also the ensuing discussion on its appropriateness here on LinkedIn. I think sometimes we making things too important and sometimes we need to allow for some room to roam. I don't see anything really offensive here, so I find that its not warranted to be offended by it. If anything, I might have thoughts that the article was just deliberately written to achieve readers. An understandable ploy if that was the case - even if I don't personally enjoy such endeavors. But then again, how else do you get things moving to a big enough state?

Like
Reply
Ilias Charlafti

Global Medical Affairs Site Head (Site Basel-Kaiseraugst) at Roche

9y

Cheeky but right:)

Like
Reply
C. Anderson "Andy" Romagnano

Democratic nominee for Emerald Coast Utilities Authority District 2

9y

What a perverse article

Like
Reply
Luis Novo

Product Director @ UOL EdTech | Product Management, Online Learning

9y

I would just add a #12 - when two ideas merge, they create a third thing that is much bigger than them.

Like
Reply
John Lovelett

Head of Product, Ascensus Government Savings

9y

Is it April Fool 's Day again?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics