Is 'Showrooming' the Future of Retailing?

Warby Parker, a super-fashionable online eye glasses retailer, has done an amazing job of selling people a product no one thought was suited to e-commerce. So why has it just opened a fancy bricks-and-mortar flagship store in Mahattan's SoHo shopping district? Maybe it is because "showrooming" is the future of retailing.

The story of how Warby Parker became the "Netflix of Eye Wear" was told to me recently by Neil Blumenthal, a co-founder of the firm. You can watch a clip from my interview with him for Newswire here:

:

Less than 1% of eye glasses were sold online when Blumenthal and his co-founders decided to launch Warby Parker, a name derived from two early Jack Kerouac characters to evoke an intelligent, cool brand image. They had figured out a profitable way to make good looking prescription glasses for just $95, maybe 20% or less of what offline retailers charge. The big challenge was that people typically like to try on their new frames first, to see how they look, which is not easily done via a website. Even creating a way for website users to post a photo and try frames on that did not really do the job. The breakthrough was the "home try-on".

Potential customers choose five frames they like, try-on versions of which are sent by express mail to their home or office, where they can put them on, maybe share pictures with their friends to get second opinions, and decide which they would like. Then they return the try-on frames by mail, and their newly made eye wear is delivered soon after.

This has caught on like wildfire. Consulting colleagues at work about which try-on frame to buy has proved an unexpectedly powerful marketing tool, Blumenthal told me. Warby Parker's sales have soared, and Blumenthal anticipates that within a few years, perhaps 15% of eye glasses will be sold online. That would be a remarkable demonstration of the power of the e-commerce retailing model. So why open a traditional store?

Ever since e-commerce took off in the late 1990s, there has been a debate in retailing over "bricks versus clicks." At times, particularly at the height of the dotcom bubble, there were predictions that online stores would make physical shops obsolete, malls would disappear and the high street would just become a long, depressing line of Starbucks outlets. This vision of what the economist Schumpeter called "creative destruction" has been revived recently since price comparison apps on mobile phones have allowed customers to demand online-equivalent prices in physical stores, exposing the higher costs of physical stores to a potentially devastating competitive pressure.

I am now in the camp that thinks we will see a dramatic rise in the next few years in the proportion of retail sales taking place through e-commerce - which is now still less than one fifth, far smaller than all the excitement about cyber-shopping might have led you to think. Yet what Warby Parker's store opening shows is that even the very best e-tailers now believe that a physical showroom can help - even if most of their sales will take place online.

Blumenthal says Warby Parker has never seen itself as an online-only business, and believes there is an opportunity to grow sales offline as well as online. The goal of the flagship store, which follows experiments with temporary "pop-up" outlets inside some big department stores and a few earlier showrooms, seems to be to reinforce the notion that the Warby Parker brand is far more upmarket and sophisticated than its every day low prices might imply. According to the firm's blog, the store is designed to resemble a library, complete with a "selection of books from small presses... available for flipping–through or adding to your personal collection". The goal is to be an enjoyable experience and inherently social, in contrast to e-commerce: "shopping for glasses should be like browsing at a library: quick, easy, and especially fun to do with a friend in tow." Never mind, I'm betting, that most of Warby Parker's customers haven't been to a library in years, let alone with a friend!

Even if traditional stores are rendered uncompetitive by mobile phone price comparisons, there will probably continue to be a role for some physical stores not as primary sales outlets but as showrooms, where customers can get a "richer experience" of their beloved brands than would ever be possible online. Indeed, according to TechCrunch, it may not be long before showroom stores are opened by those internet giants, Amazon and Google - though judging by all the crazy stuff Google has in its innovation pipeline, from self-driving cars and internet connected "glass" eye wear to a space elevator, maybe a theme park would be more appropriate. Welcome to Google World?

Meanwhile, Blumenthal told me on April 16th, there were queues around the block when its new store opened at the weekend. In line for online offline...

What do you think?

Rakesh Raghuvanshi

Founder & CEO @ Sekel Tech | CDP, Discovery, Demand Generation

10y

well its the next extension of the premium pitch for Brand online like Borden.co.uk

Like
Reply
Eche Onwugbenu

Founder, Startup Story | Publisher, Startup News | Host, Startup Chats | Travel & Event Consultant | Writer | Entrepreneur.

10y

It certainly is and it could be the next most innovative way to spend time in stores we would normally not visit. It defines social business as the next phase of retailing - mixing online etiquette with business culture and the high pursuit of interactive sales people who care deeply about meeting the needs of the clients and employers alike.

Like
Reply
Andreas Felsl

HORAGE & IP-strategy

10y

Onliners have high return rates, bricks & mortar excess inventory and incomplete product lineup. This are basically the problems we are facing right now. Both ways are highly inefficient which means they loose money on cost of each other. Online retailers sell products because people walk in stores try stuff, walk out and buy them online, traditional retailers either want to go big or try to make "a rich" experience. To be honest as long as brands do not take control over their sales channels and thus the final pricing, the richest experience does not help to solve the fundamental flaws of both systems (high return rates at the onliners and statistical weak sales hit rate due to ever growing product lineup) Slowly the already forgotten term omnichannel is coming back into focus. Many people talk about it, but it somehow seems that nobody knows how to do it in a cost efficient way. But once it works every brand which is proud of its products likely will start to take control over the entire sales channels. Just wondering what online retailers will do then;-) Believe it or not but running an omnichannel system is more simple than people would think especially with mobile devices. Watch a small bike company called BIONICON from south germany. They enter traditional retailers as a direct brand , sharing risk, because this is the root problem of retailers and small or medium size brands. I bet mobile enabled Omni channel retailing controlled by the brands will pretty much disrupt both online retailers and traditional retail structures.

Like
Reply
Gaylene Nagel

Start-Up App Consultant, Mobile & Experiential Marketing Expert

10y

A great idea that would fall under "common sense is not so common". Expanding on consumer behavior trends is always a highway to success, but often not adopted by industry leaders - remember how the music industry fought consumers who wanted to buy music online? They couldn't see past their own biz model. If they could, they would have bought Napster and owned downloading music - they already owned the audience, but they chose to prosecute them. This Christmas there were many news articles and clips about "Showrooming" with the overtone of guilting shoppers into supporting retail locations - shades of buying music online. If that is what consumers want - to drive down and look at the product and then go home and order it online - why not let them order it in the store and make the sale yourself? I applaud this move - but really - it's just common sense, isn't it?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics