Why call it Information Governance,not the traditional Data Governance

If the Business should own, sponsor, drive and pay for this, then we should call it Information Governance (IG), not Data Governance (DG). Like it or not, the word ‘data’ often bears negative connotations with Business executives. They hear ‘data’ and think ‘problems’, or ‘IT’.

But use the word ‘information’, with its positive connotations of business value and strategic insight, and the Business is more likely to listen, based also on the often intuitive assumption that information = data + context/process.

Gartner was one of the first major organizations a few years ago to move from DG to IG, also to align it with their wider Enterprise Information Management terminology and also because ‘data’ suggests it’s only about structured data (some Gartner reports, rather inconsistently, still refer to “Data” Governance as well). Forrester still calls it DG, as do most tool vendors.

You could easily argue that they are different concepts, but trying to differentiate between IG and DG becomes academic quite quickly and unless you agree on one term only you’re even more likely to lose your critical Business Directors’ attention.

[this is part 11 in a 14-part blog on Capgemini’s “QuickStart Information Governance” framework]

For more information on QuickStart Information Governance, please contact Ralf Teschner.

Ronald Damhof

Chief Data Officer Ministry of Justice and Security

9y

Whenever someone starts the discussion between data & information, I tend to out. Sorry

Like
Reply
Kash Mehdi

Vice President of Growth @ DataGalaxy | Helping humans make better decisions with data and AI.

9y

Great article. I think the perception of "data" is changing among the business users of data For example, in many large or small organizations data workers (stewards, stakeholders, SME, etc.) representing both IT and business are coming together to establish data authority (Leadership or Stewardship). If we start saying Information Governance and not Data Governance then in a way we are actually hiding problems. The business side has always played a major role in streamlining IT efforts. Think of it in terms of a infrastructure, where IT is in-charge to build pipelines for data to move and Business to decide what data goes through the pipelines.

Like
Reply

Steven -- Can you please explain why tangible doesn't mean valuable and mean fraud. Shouldn't it be the other way around if we take Michael Porter out of the picture?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics